The estimated national debt is about $34.27 trillion, according to the United States Department of Treasury. Paying off the U.S. federal debt will prove to be a long-term challenge that could have a significant impact on the job market. For example, a default on the U.S. debt could lead to substantial job losses, potentially affecting millions of workers. In 2023, White House economists warned that a protracted default scenario could eradicate 8 million jobs from the U.S. economy.
“Without the ability to spend on counter-cyclical measures such as extended unemployment insurance, Federal and state governments would be hamstrung in responding to this turmoil and unable to buffer households from the impacts,” the Council of Economic Advisers reported in a White House blog post.
“Neither would households be able to borrow through the private sector as the interest rates on the financial instruments that households and businesses use—Treasury bonds, mortgages, and credit card interest rates—would skyrocket due to risks of an uncertain future,” the CEA added.
The Difficulties Of Dealing With A Huge Debt Burden
The relationship between the U.S. national debt and the job market is influenced by a number of factors. High debt levels lead to higher interest rates, making it more expensive for businesses to borrow money for expansion and investment, which can potentially slow down job creation.
To reduce the debt, the federal government will need to implement spending cuts or tax increases. These actions impact government programs and consumer spending, leading to job losses in certain sectors. Additionally, a high debt burden can create uncertainty and undermine investor confidence, adversely impacting economic growth and hiring.
Government spending, financed by debt, stimulates the economy and job growth in the short term, particularly in public sectors and industries receiving government contracts, which is evident in recent U.S. jobs reports.
A high national debt could raise the likelihood of a financial crisis, which would spark job losses and economic instability. Some economists fear that continued growth of the national debt could undermine U.S. global leadership by leaving fewer resources for military, diplomatic and humanitarian operations, which could indirectly affect the job market.
According to Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi, a U.S. debt default could wipe out $15 trillion in household wealth.
What Could Be Done
Addressing the U.S. federal debt and its impact on the job market requires comprehensive policy measures, economic reforms and strategic planning. It is critical to consider the potential consequences of high levels of debt on job creation, labor market dynamics and Americans’ financial well-being.
Some suggest, despite strong opposition, that opening the U.S. borders would help. A study co-authored by an MIT economist found that immigrants are 80% more likely to start a business than native-born U.S. citizens, which would serve to benefit the economy and job market.
Proponents of this solution say that by opening the borders, future entrepreneurs from all over the world would help fuel the business creation that results in higher tax revenue that is desperately needed to reduce the national debt.
A faster-growing population, due to immigration, could also create more demand for everything from housing to cars. This may result in a stronger economy that can help pay down the debt. Also, having more individual wage earners would help finance Social Security and other social programs for decades to come, according to analysis from the Cato Institute.
Another controversial solution that will surely make people unhappy is to raise the retirement age. Making the full amount of Social Security retirement benefits available to Americans in their 70s instead of their 60s could help reduce the national debt since it increases the amount that people pay into Social Security and reduces the time that they rely on payments from the program.
Paying off the debt completely would require significant sacrifices or economic measures. Reducing government spending across various programs could free up resources for debt repayment. Raising taxes could generate additional revenue for debt repayment. However, this would be politically divisive and impact different income groups unevenly.
Extending debt maturities or negotiating lower interest rates with creditors would reduce the immediate burden. A combination of measures, like balanced spending cuts, strategic tax adjustments and economic growth strategies, might be more sustainable and politically viable.
Completely eliminating the debt might not be the sole objective. Aiming for sustainable debt levels that ensure fiscal responsibility and long-term economic stability might be a more pragmatic goal.
Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn. Check out my website or some of my other work here.