Home Personal Finance Would It Offset Cost Of Raising A Child?

Would It Offset Cost Of Raising A Child?

by admin

Trump Floats $5,000 Baby Bonus To Boost Birthrate

President Donald Trump’s administration is considering a one-time $5,000 baby bonus for new parents to tackle America’s declining birth rate, according to reporting by the New York Times . This so-called Trump baby bonus would give every American mother a $5,000 cash payment after the birth of a child. After the NYT article came out, Trump was asked about the potential of providing the financial incentive, to which he responded, “Sounds like a good idea to me,” The Hill reported.

The idea is to encourage more Americans to get married and have children. It’s one of several proposals being floated to reverse the U.S. birthrate decline; others include expanded child tax credit incentives and even programs teaching fertility awareness. The push comes amid decades of falling birthrates. The total fertility rate in 2023 was just 1.62 births per woman, well below the replacement level of 2.1.

The Trump administration’s $5,000 baby bonus proposal spotlights the finances needed to start a family. Would a one-time cash boost be enough to change plans to raise a family?

Would A $5,000 Baby Bonus Make A Difference?

For prospective parents, an extra $5,000 could be helpful and is clearly superior to no bonus. It could cover a hospital deductible or buy a crib, stroller, and a few months’ supply of diapers. It could offset a month or two of daycare. However, the key question is whether $5,000 is enough to influence family planning decisions meaningfully. One could be skeptical that a one-time bonus of this size would dramatically change couples’ choices about whether or when to have a child, given that there are much larger economic and personal factors; $5,000 is a drop compared to the overall costs of raising a child.

If families delay children due to concerns like career impact, housing costs, or existing debt, a $5,000 check may not be a game-changer. For many couples, decisions about raising a family involve long-term calculations: job stability, childcare availability, student loan borrowers with kids juggling debt, and the prospect of 18+ years of expenses.

While new parents would welcome a baby bonus, it might not move the needle enough to spur a baby boom. “As a mother of three, here’s what $5,000 gets me in 2025: 3 months of diapers + 2.5 weeks of daycare + enough mac & cheese to keep the peace through age 6 + 1 ER visit because someone ‘didn’t swallow’ a coin + a few outfits that will be outgrown by next Tuesday,” wrote Allison Whalen, the CEO of Parently, in a LinkedIn post. “If we want to support working families and increase birth rates, it’s going to take more than a one-time coupon. So let’s keep pushing for the things we need that are bipartisan. Things like: Paid parental leave, affordable, high-quality childcare, career protection and re-entry support. Until then, $5K is just … a pacifier,” she continued.

High Cost of Raising A Child In 2025 May Trump Make $5,000 Baby Bonus

One reason a $5,000 baby bonus may not go far is the cost of raising a child in the United States today. According to an analysis by the Brookings Institution, the average middle-income married couple will spend about $310,000 to raise a child born in 2015 through age 17. That’s roughly $18,000 per year (and this estimate was made after recent inflation, illustrating how much higher the price tag has grown). With costs at these levels, financial considerations likely weigh heavily on would-be parents. A $5,000 baby bonus could alleviate some immediate bills but may unlikely persuade someone to have a child if they aren’t financially ready.

Moreover, the birthrate decline in recent years has coincided with sky-high rents, expensive childcare, and economic uncertainty, which make young adults think twice about having children. Viewed against this backdrop, a one-time $5,000 bonus would cover only a small fraction of the cost of raising a child to adulthood. Ultimately, $5,000 might help with initial baby expenses, but it doesn’t come close to offsetting the overall financial commitment of a child. Parents would still be on the hook for the rest of the costs over the next two decades.

A Twist On The $5,000 Baby Bonus Concept

One intriguing twist to the $5,000 baby bonus idea could be to ask what happens if that money isn’t spent but invested for the child’s future. If parents or the government were to deposit the $5,000 bonus into a child investment account and let it grow, the power of compounding could turn that one-time gift into a far more significant sum. Assuming an average annual stock market return of about 8%, $5,000 invested at birth could grow to roughly $20,000 by the time the child turns 18, potentially helping with college costs or seed money for a first home. If left untouched until the child reaches 65, that $5,000 could balloon to around $740,000 at a continued 8% annual growth).

In other words, a modest baby bonus invested for the long haul might yield a substantial nest egg for the child. This illustrates the time value of money: the earlier you invest, the more compounding works in your favor. Of course, not every family can afford to set aside the bonus for decades, and many will need to spend it on immediate needs. Still, it highlights how child investment accounts or baby bonds could change financial outcomes over a lifetime.

$5,000 Baby Bonus Has Echoes Of Bill Ackman’s Million-Dollar Baby Bond Idea

The notion of investing a lump sum at birth isn’t new. Billionaire investor Bill Ackman made headlines with a similar proposal in 2020, suggesting the government give every U.S. newborn $6,750 at birth and invest it on their behalf. Ackman dubbed this seed investment a Birthright Fund, to be put into a zero-cost stock index fund and left to compound tax-free for decades. The result, he calculated, would be impressive. By age 65, that account could grow to over $1 million, assuming historical 8% annual returns ($6,750 earning 8% annually for 65 years comes above the million-dollar mark). At age 74, it could reach $2 million.

In Ackman’s vision, every American would retire as a millionaire, providing universal retirement security. Meanwhile the Trump administration’s $5,000 baby bonus concept is more of a nudge to encourage having children; a one-time payment to parents, not a locked retirement account.

Current Tax Incentives For Parents Beyond Potential $5,000 Baby Bonus

It’s also worth noting that American parents already receive some bonuses for having children, mainly in tax incentives. Among several, the Child Tax Credit currently provides up to $2,000 per child each year to help offset parenting expenses. There’s also the Child and Dependent Care Credit, which can reimburse a portion of daycare or after-school care costs up to a maximum credit of about $1,050 for one child or $2,100 for two or more qualifying expenses.

Beyond the baby bonus and other ideas currently reportedly being considered, there are additional policy ideas that could significantly move the needle. As Reshma Saujani, Founder and CEO of Moms First, put it in a LinkedIn post, : “Well, it ain’t rocket science, folks. If you want Americans to have more babies, there are two logical places to start. Lower the cost of child care. Pass paid family leave.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment